Skip to main content

Patrick Byrne, CEO of, Dodges Questions about SEC Subpoenas and Plays Games

To Patrick Byrne (CEO of

Recently, on the Slashdot internet message board, I asked you simple and straight forward questions relating to the personal Securities and Exchange Commission subpoena that you received on May 17, 2006 but was not disclosed by until about a year later on May 9, 2007.
You continue to dodge questions about the SEC subpoenas. You have falsely claimed that the "heart of the investigation is not...Overstock-centric."
However,, you, and others working in collusion with you are under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Will you admit that and you are the focus of an investigation by the SEC? Are you afraid to show transparency by answering my questions?
Rather than show the transparency that you claim to have, you identified me as a crook and posted (link here or see copy below) innuendo filled deflections on the Slashdot message board.
My response to your refusal to answer questions and your allegations
It is quite ironic that you are using your smear web site to host an image of my Yahoo post in your response to me. As detailed in this blog and other blogs,'s Director of Communications, Judd Bagley, who administers on your behalf, has used physical threats, blackmail, anti-Semitic comments, smears, and other despicable actions as tools to carry out your vendettas against your critics.
Acting as your proxy, Judd Bagley has posted the home addresses and IP addresses of certain critics on your smear web site. Your other pal Bob O'Brien, aka Phil Saunders, has posted the location and identities of immediate family members (including a child) of Marc Cohodes (a money manager from a firm you are suing). You in turn have contributed at least $75,000 to your buddy Bob O'Brien aka Phil Saunders NCANS organization and your company provides links to his smear web site. Your henchman, Judd Bagley, using one of his multiple anonymous aliases (pananapump), has called Bob O'Brien a "hero" on the Yahoo message boards. Your crony, Bob O'Brien still refuses to identify himself although media reports identify him as Phil Saunders.
Your crony, Judd Bagley has permitted the posting of anti-Semitic comments, physical threats, and smears directed against your critics on In addition, Judd Bagley had threatened my family and my future employability in a Yahoo post using the anonymous alias, panamapump. Judd Bagley was upset that I had visited the smear web site in an effort to report your vile, malicious, and despicable activities. Judd Bagley has been kicked off of both Yahoo and InvestorVillage for his cyber stalking and harassment of your critics under multiple anonymous ids. You have permitted Judd Bagley to stalk your critics on internet message boards using anonymous aliases. You have threatened, harassed, intimidated, and smeared your critics on the internet and elsewhere.
It was only after my family and I had been threatened by Judd Bagley and certain personal information on a web site relating to my son and immediate family was linked to in posts on Yahoo over several days, that I posted your home address, Evren Karpak's (an contributor) home address, and the names of Judd Bagley's wife and children (without identifying Judd's home address) on Yahoo. My Yahoo post that you refer to in your Shashdot post contains no threats. In addition, Judd Bagley has no issue with the names of his wife and children being posted on other internet web sites that show his family tree and are easily accessible in a Google search.
I had apologized to you, Evren Karpak, and Judd Bagley for my Yahoo post and asked Yahoo to take it down the next day. I was wrong to lower myself to your lack of morality and go into the mud with you. However, afterwards you in turn re-posted that same offending link to the web site that clearly lists my son's name, office address, and other personal information relating to my immediate family on's web site. My name was nowhere to be found on that web site you had linked to. However, my son's name is listed on that web site.
You have not been contrite about any of your vile, malicious, and despicable actions. Instead to have continued your attempts to instill fear in any potential critics by harassment, intimidation, litigation, smears, and any other tool you deem fit to use. You have not apologized or taken any steps to stop your despicable behavior.
Neither you or Judd Bagley has ever apologized for the use of anti-Semitic comments and smears directed at me and others on You and Judd Bagley have never apologized for the physical threats that were posted on Judd Bagley and Evren Karpak have never apologized for blackmailing the blogger Scipio Africanus on your behalf. You have never apologized for Judd Bagley's and Evren Karpak's vile, malicious, and despicable actions in carrying out your vendettas against your critics. Instead you have encouraged the use of anti-Semitic comments, physical threats, the posting of personal information about your critics, blackmail, and smears to harass, intimidate, and silence your critics.
Any mistakes that I have made (which I have since apologized for) are no excuse for your vile, malicious, and despicable conduct and actions that continue today. Your despicable actions and the vile and malicious actions of those persons working in concert with you have been detailed by me and others who are not afraid of you and your cronies. The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating, you, and others working in collusion with you. I can see why you are afraid to answer questions about your questionable conduct. You must have a lot to hide.
Therefore, I ask you to answer my questions again. If you are afraid to answer my questions about the SEC subpoenas, then be a man and say it rather than hide through your deflections. Your deflections, childish behavior, and antics will not work when you testify in sworn depositions and possibly at a future trial.
Again, I ask you to answer the questions below.
Questions about the delay in disclosing your personal SEC subpoena
Do you seriously expect anyone to believe that your press release issued on May 9, 2006 was responding to a personal SEC subpoena that you later received on May 17, 2006?
Is it your position that any person reading your May 9, 2006 press release would have known that you were going to receive a personal SEC subpoena on May 17, 2006?
If it is your position that the May 9, 2006 press release was adequate disclosure of both subpoenas, why did make a disclosure of your personal SEC subpoena about a year later on May 9, 2007?
Is it your position that there are no issues relating to the timing of disclosures by about your personal SEC subpoena?
Do you believe that your public comments on message boards concerning these subpoenas have been consistent with all of Overstock's disclosures in documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission?
Why didn't disclose your personal SEC subpoena (received on May 17, 2006) on an earlier date?
When did each Audit Committee member individually learn about your personal SEC subpoena (received on May 17, 2006)?
When did personnel at PriceWaterhouseCoopers learn about your personal SEC subpoena (received on May 17, 2006)?
When did you first discuss your personal SEC subpoena (received on May 17, 2006) with General Counsel Jonathan Johnson?
If it is your position that there was nothing improper with the delay by in disclosing your personal SEC subpoena, why did the company choose to disclose it at all?
If you truly wish to clear up this issue, why not respond to each of my questions individually in a clear, unambiguous, and truthful manner?
Rather than address my questions, you had posted the following response on Slashdot

Hi Sam the Crook,
"If you truly wish to clear up this issue, why not respond to each of my questions individually in a clear, unambiguous, and truthful manner?"
Ummm, could it be because collecitvely they number in the thousands, and I cannot say I've ever actually read one of your postings closely?
I really want to help you here, Sam, but I just need to know how you are using the English language, because it seems a little disjoint to me. When you answer this question, I will be able to understand your verb tenses, and general sense of reality, enough to answer your questions. So let us try again:
When I, on May 9, said that I was the first CEO to celebrate receiving an SEC subpoena, was I telling the truth about being a CEO who had received a subpoena, or not?
Get back to me with an answer, and I'll be able to make sense of your questions, Sam.
PS In case any member of the public wanders by, please understand that this guy I am conversing with is a convicted felon who ratted out his own family to reduce his own jail time. Recently he was kicked off of YAHOO (no easy feat, that) for threatening children (see below). Because he apparently has absolutely no moral center, Sam has in recent months become a favorite of hedge fund choagies like Herb Greenberg, who is promoting Sam so he can have someone new with whom to practice crony journalism. Next will be, I am sure, a flattering pieces in DJ by Carol Remond, a write up in NYPost by Roddy Boyd, a Fortune cover by Bethany McLean, and a special WSJ profile by Karen "We-can-do-this-the-hard-way-or-the-easy-way" Richardson (that is, that pack of independent journalists who randomly happen to cover precisely those firms shorted by Rocker, Cohodes, Ackerman, Steve Cohen, Einhorn, Dan Loeb/Jim Caruthers, etc., over and over with complete regularity in a way that is, all observers are clear, entirely coincidental). Seriously, check it out: [].*
* Note: To avoid visitors to your smear web site getting their personal information published, a copy of the Yahoo post is provided here.
Stop your evil actions and seek help
Your despicable conduct has made you the laughing stock of America. I call on you to stop your smear campaign, take down your web site, and end your vile, malicious, and despicable behavior. You should resign from, admit your sins to the government investigators, apologize for your evil actions, and seek help from a psychiatrist. Otherwise, you may end up like a hog in cage.
If anything is ruining, it is you.
Written by:
Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)
Note: I worked as the CFO for Crazy Eddie Antar, "the Darth Vader of Capitalism."
Patrick Byrne still has not identified the Sith Lord.
Other blogs covering and Patrick Byrne
Gary Weiss
Jeff Matthews
Herb Greenberg
Tracy Coenen
Deal Breaker
Floyd Norris (Subscription Required)
Hedge Funnies
Articles on and Patrick Byrne

New York Times:'s Campaign of Menace by Joe Nocera (Subscription Required)
New York Times: Revisiting and Utah by Joe Nocera (Subscription Required)
Forbes Magazine: Phantom Menace by Bethany McLean
The Register: The Bizzare World of Patrick Byrne's Overstock by Ashlee Vance
New York Post: Lashes Out at Critics on the Web by Roddy Boyd


Scipio said…
"Your crony, Judd Bagley has permitted the posting of anti-Semitic comments, physical threats, and smears directed against your critics on"

He also doesn't appear to be too friendly to those of Indian decent. 3 examples.

These two were anonymous at the time, but he left spyware fingerprints all over the place allowing easy identification of the author:

Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…