Skip to main content

Another Question about Timing of NBTY Insider Stock Purchases Prior to Announcement of Carlyle Acquisition

In my last blog post about NBTY (NYSE: NTY), I examined the timing of purchases of company stock by directors Michael L. Ashner and Peter J. White just two months before the July 15 announcement that Carlyle Group was acquiring NBTY at about $55 per share in cash. CNBC’s David Faber reported that, “Carlyle approached NBTY with an offer in early May, according to people familiar with the deal.” Both Ashner and White purchased their shares in mid-May at about $34 per share and $35 per share respectively. I wanted to know if “early May” meant “before or after” Michael Ashner and Peter White purchased their NBTY shares.

Now, we have an answer and one more question.

NBTY Preliminary Proxy Statement

Yesterday, NBTY filed a Preliminary Proxy Statement which provided certain details of the events leading up to the announced acquisition of the company by Carlyle:
The board of directors and senior management in the ordinary course of business continually review and assess strategic alternatives available to us to enhance stockholder value. As part of this ongoing process, the board of directors has also periodically considered potential business combination transactions. BofA Merrill Lynch has from time to time, as requested by the Company, assisted the board of directors and senior management in this strategic review process.

From time to time over the last few years, a number of parties, including Carlyle, have approached Scott Rudolph, Chairman and Chief Executive of the Company, Harvey Kamil, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and representatives from BofA Merrill Lynch regarding possible transactions involving the Company. Until the discussions described below, those approaches did not proceed past preliminary conversations and exchanges of limited confidential information.

On or about April 23, 2010, a representative from Carlyle contacted Mr. Kamil and expressed Carlyle’s interest in exploring a potential business combination transaction with the Company. Mr. Kamil subsequently informed Mr. Scott Rudolph of this expression of interest.

Mr. Kamil then had a preliminary discussion with representatives from Carlyle to further clarify and understand Carlyle’s interest. On April 29, 2010, the Company and an affiliate of Carlyle entered into a confidentiality agreement, dated as of April 27, 2010, which was subsequently amended on June 1, 2010. Carlyle was then provided with limited confidential information about the Company.

On May 11, 2010, Mr. Scott Rudolph and Mr. Kamil met with representatives from Carlyle to discuss the Company and gather additional information about Carlyle’s interest.
According to SEC filings, on May 13, 2010, Michael Ashner purchased 5,000 NBTY common shares at a total cost of $171,295 or an average price per share of $34.26. Five days later on May 18, 2010, Peter White purchased 4,000 NBTY common shares at a total cost of $140,398 or an average price per share of $35.10.

The Preliminary Proxy Statement goes on to provide additional details:
On May 21, 2010, the board of directors held a regularly scheduled meeting. Members of senior management and representatives from BofA Merrill Lynch and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, the Company’s outside legal counsel, which we refer to as Sullivan & Cromwell, participated in this meeting. Mr. Scott Rudolph reviewed with the board of directors the approach by Carlyle to the Company, the execution of a confidentiality agreement with an affiliate of Carlyle and the discussions with and information provided to Carlyle at that time.
As I detailed above, on July 15, 2010, NBTY announced that it was being acquired by the Carlyle Group for $55 per share.

Based on the above timeline, Michael Ashner and Peter White purchased their NBTY stock after the “Company and an affiliate of Carlyle entered into a confidentiality agreement” and “Mr. Scott Rudolph and Mr. Kamil met with representatives from Carlyle to discuss the Company and gather additional information about Carlyle’s interest.” So I have one additional question.


At what point in time did Ashner and White know anything about the discussions with Carlyle and when did they find out about the confidentiality agreement?

Often, such agreements are executed after the board has been notified. In this case, the confidentiality agreement was signed before Ashner and White purchased their NBTY shares.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar


I am a convicted felon and a former CPA. As the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I helped Eddie Antar and other members of his family mastermind one of the largest securities frauds uncovered during the 1980's. I committed my crimes in cold-blood for fun and profit, and simply because I could.

If it weren't for the efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today.

There is a saying, "It takes one to know one." Today, I work very closely with the FBI, IRS, SEC, Justice Department, and other federal and state law enforcement agencies in training them to identify and catch white-collar criminals.

I do not seek or want forgiveness for my vicious crimes from my victims. I plan on frying in hell with other white-collar criminals for a very long time.

Recently, I exposed GAAP violations by (NASDAQ: OSTK) which caused the company to restate its financial reports for the third time in three years. The SEC is now investigating and its CEO Patrick Byrne for securities law violations (Details here, here, and here).

In addition, the SEC is now investigating possible GAAP violations by (NASDAQ: BIDZ) after I alerted them about the company's inventory accounting practices.

I do not own NBTY securities long or short.


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…