Skip to main content

Patrick Byrne (CEO of Overstock.com) deceives the New York Times about his activities on internet message boards

In previous posts on this blog, I have detailed Patrick Byrne's vile and malicious smear campaign directed by him against his critics. His deceptions continue according comments he made in a recent interview with the New York Times.

Recently, John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods, has come under fire because of his anonymous posting on internet message boards. Using the anonymous alias Rahodeb, Mr. Mackey assailed his competitors and promoted his company. According to a recent New York Times article entitled, "The Hand That Controls the Sock Puppet Could Get Slapped," (subscription required) by Brad Stone and Matt Richtel:

Patrick M. Byrne, founder and chief executive of the beleaguered online retailer Overstock.com, has for years been accused of anonymously resorting to the Internet to do battle with his company's critics. In an interview, Mr. Byrne said that he never hides his true identity and always signs his name when he posts under his online handle, "Hannibal" (the Carthaginian conqueror, not the celluloid serial killer).

Mr. Byrne said he uses online forums to convey what he has learned about the hidden agendas of his critics. "Nothing about being a public figure compels one to surrender one's First Amendment rights," he said.

Note: Cap letters and italics added by me.

While Patrick Byrne claims that he does not post anonymously, he certainly does not make it easy to identify his posts on internet message boards

The blogger known by his pen name Scipio Africanus (O-Smear Blog), who Byrne's cronies Judd Bagley and Evren Karpak attempted to blackmail, wrote the following comment to a post on Herb Greenberg’s Market Blog entitled, "Updated: Whole Foods' Fiasco: What Do CEO Mackey and Patrick Byrne Share in Common?"

It's not as easy to discern who Hannibal is as Overstock PR proxy Evren would like you to believe.

Here are the stats on how Patrick Byrne has signed his "Hannibal" posts on InvestorVillage:

  • 1 signed as Patrick Byrne, CEO
  • 3 signed as Patrick Byrne
  • 57 signed as Patrick
  • 34 unsigned

The user profile is private and gives no clues. A similar (if not worse) scenario exists on the Motley Fool, although I do not have accurate stats from there.

Note: Bold Print and italics added by me.

I once asked Patrick Byrne to sign his full name to posts on InvestorVillage and was later booted for asking him "deposition style" questions

On January 29, 2007, in a post (message number 4166), on InvestorVillage, I asked Patrick Byrne to clear up the confusion:

Hannibal:

Can you please sign your post with your full name so there is no misunderstanding as to who is replying?

Patrick Byrne (CEO of Overstock.com) uses the handle Hannibal. Let's clear up any misunderstanding as to who is responding.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Note: Bold print and italics added by me.

Patrick Byrne chose not to reply to the above question. Later, he complained (message number 4463) that I was acting as a “Junior Prosecutor" and asked other message board readers to ignore me:

Is there anyone here who suspects that Sam is just trying to clog, or waste my time, or misdirect this discussion board? If you agree, please recommend this post. If we get over 20, I say that is proof that it is time we all agree to ignore Sam forever.

Note: Bold print and italics added by me.

About three weeks later, I was booted from InvestorVillage for asking "deposition style" questions to Patrick Byrne and his cronies Judd Bagley (Director of Communications at Overstock.com), and antisocialmedia.net smear web contributor, Evren Karpak.

Patrick Byrne failed to mention that his henchman, Judd Bagley, Director of Communications at Overstock.com and administrator of Overstock.com's antisocialmedia.net smear web site, has used multiple anonymous aliases on internet message boards with his approval to threaten, intimidate, harass, blackmail, and smear his critics

Another part of the New York Times article states:

Other chief executives have found their sock puppetry coming back to haunt them. At the criminal fraud trial of Hollinger International's chief executive, Conrad M. Black, prosecutors introduced evidence that the former press baron had once proposed joining a Yahoo Finance chat room to blame short sellers for his company's stock performance.

Patrick Byrne apparently believes that if he uses proxies such as Judd Bagley to threaten, harass, intimidate, blackmail, smear, and resort to anti-Semitism in an attempt to silence his critics, he can escape the long arm of the law.

Patrick Byrne has blamed almost everyone and everything but himself for the decline in his stock. He has permitted his Director of Communications, Judd Bagley, to post under multiple anonymous aliases on internet message boards that cover Overstock.com.

According the Scipio Africanus (O-Smear blog), in a blog post entitled, "Bagley and/or cohort psuedonyms," Judd Bagley has used over a dozen of anonymous aliases to intimidate, harass, threaten, blackmail, and/or smear critics of his boss, Patrick Byrne.

On January 28, 2007, I asked Judd Bagley on InvestorVillage (message number 4135) the following question about his use of anonymous aliases:

Can you provide such a list of all such aliases and all communications you have made under such aliases?

On Monday, January 29, 2007, at 2:08 PM local time, during normal office hours at Overstock.com, an angry Patrick Byrne replied (message number 4165) on behalf of Judd Bagley:

I BET HE COULD, BUT I WOULD TELL HIM I WOULD ADVISE HIM NOT TO DO SO.

Note: Patrick Byrne wrote his response in cap letters.

Patrick Byrne has approved anonymous posting on internet message boards relating to Overstock.com by his Director of Communications, Judd Bagley.

On January 29, 2007, in a post (message number 4177) on InvestorVillage, I asked by Patrick Byrne and Judd Bagley the following question:

Do you believe that the use of anonymous handles by you (Patrick Byrne or Judd Bagley) to attack non- anonymous critics of either you Patrick Byrne, Judd Bagley, or performance of Overstock.com is ethical?

That same day, Patrick Byrne replied to me (message number 4179) on InvestorVillage, using his alias Hannibal:

By way of general response, I will mentioned that I am proud of both mine and Judd's behavior ....

That will have to do.

Note: Bold print and italics added by me.

Recently, on Overstock.com's web site, Patrick Byrne wrote:

What is the limit of what is appropriate when it comes to executives going online?

Some obvious points first: I think the Achilles heel of the Internet is anonymity. People behave in an uncivilized fashion when they are anonymous, but when they are stripped of anonymity, those same people begin behaving politely.

Note: Bold print and italics added by me.

Patrick Byrne fails to mention that Judd Bagley ran the antisocialmedia.net smear web site on his behalf from its inception on September 8, 2006 to January 2, 2007 until Roddy Boyd exposed them in a New York Post article entitled, "Overstock.com Lashes out at Critics on Web."

In addition, Patrick Byrne writes:

Second, no executive (or for that matter, any employee) should ever go online to talk up her own company’s stock or try to bash a competitor’s stock price.

I guess that Patrick Byrne is delusional if believes that his own distortions and smears of critics carried out by him and his cronies, Judd Bagley and Evren Karpak, on his behalf is not the same as bashing a competitor. I believe that the Securities and Exchange Commission, who is investigating Overstock.com, Patrick Byrne, and others sees it differently.

Written by,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Additional Coverage in other Blogs

Gary Weiss Blog - Today's Patrick Byrne Lie Du Jour

FRAUDfiles Blog - Patrick Byrne lies to New York Times about message board postings by Tracy Coenen

IP & Democracy - How Many Sock Puppets Are Out There? by Cynthia Brumfield

FRAUDfiles Blog - The SEC cares when CEOs post on message boards using pseudonyms???? by Tracy Coenen

Comments

Scipio said…
I notice Byrne was very specific in saying it was bad to bash a competitor's "stock price".

There is a long history of Judd Bagley bashing, harassing and stalking Wikipedia editors. For those that actually believe the story that Bagley was hired for reasons other than AntiSocialMedia, you may recall the cover story is Omuse (a Wikipedia competitor), as Byrne describes it:

"In August he approached me about developing an alternative. I agreed, and he joined Overstock."
http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=3532&mn=4287&pt=msg&mid=1338371

The most revolting example is here:
http://o-smear.blogspot.com/2006/08/i-have-things-i-want-and-you-stand-in.html

But there are no shortage of other examples:
http://o-smear.blogspot.com/search/label/Wikipedia

Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had …

Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that Overstock.com CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…