Showing posts with label Bagell Josephs Levine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bagell Josephs Levine. Show all posts

Monday, September 30, 2013

Was Medifast transparent with investors about an S.E.C. investigation?

About two weeks ago, Medifast (NYSE: MED) disclosed that it consented to an entry of a Cease-and Desist Order and agreed to pay a $200,000 civil money penalty in connection with an "investigation" by the Securities and Exchange Commission into its financial reporting from 2006 to 2009. However, Medifast's press release and 8-K report made no mention that Brendan N. Connors, its former CFO and Marc G. Nochimson, the engagement partner who had supervised Medifast's audits, consented to the entry of separate Cease-and-Desist Orders which alleged improper conduct. Furthermore, I did not find any specific disclosure of the above referenced investigation in any of Medifast's previous filings with the S.E.C. I asked the company for an explanation via email, but it did not respond my request.

Medifast pays a $200,000 civil penalty

Both Medifast's press release and identical 8-K report did not mention that its former CFO and the engagement partner who supervised its audits had consented to the entry of separate Cease-and-Desist Orders. They only stated that:

On September 18, 2013, Medifast, Inc. (the “Company”) reached a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in connection with an SEC investigation of certain items in the Company’s financial statements for the years 2006 through 2009 that led to the Company’s restatement of such financial statements in 2010 and 2011. Under the settlement, the Company, without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, consented to the entry of a cease-and-desist order prohibiting the Company from committing or causing any violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 12b-20 and 13a-1 thereunder and agreed to pay a civil penalty of $200,000. As noted in the order instituting the proceeding, the SEC considered the remedial acts undertaken by the Company, including its enhancement of internal controls and retention of additional accounting personnel. [Emphasis added.]

According to the Cease-and-Desist Order entered against Medifast, it understated income tax expense from 2006 to 2008 and it overstated revenue and understated certain other expenses from 2008 to 2009. It said:

Medifast’s improper accounting practices and internal controls deficiencies resulted in Medifast filing periodic reports with the Commission for the years 2006 through 2009 which materially overstated its income and understated its expenses. [Emphasis added.]

For example, Medifast "did not comply with FAS 109" governing the proper accrual of income tax expense and deferred tax liabilities. From 2006 to 2008, Medifast understated income tax expense and "materially" overstated net income "by an average of 12.4% over the three affected years." The order revealed that Medifast's internal income tax calculations did not match up to the numbers it reported:

9. Moreover, Medifast’s reported income tax provision in its Form 10-Ks for the years 2007 and 2008 were not supported by Medifast’s internal income tax provision worksheets for those years. These worksheets were used to calculate the Company’s current and deferred taxes at year-end for financial statement and GAAP purposes. [Emphasis added.]

According to a separate Cease-and-Desist Order entered against former CFO Brendan N. Connors, his income tax calculations did not match the numbers Medifast reported in its financial reports:

9. In addition, Connors’ tax calculations as entered on the Tax Spreadsheets differed materially from the current and deferred income tax provisions that were reported in Medifast’s Form 10-K filings. On the Tax Spreadsheet for 2007, for example, Connors calculated the Company’s current tax provision as $1,805,708 and a total deferred tax asset of $1,079,321. In contrast to those numbers, however, Medifast’s Form 10-K for 2007 reported the current income tax provision as $1,233,000 and a deferred tax expense of $473,000. On Medifast’s Tax Spreadsheet for 2008, Connors calculated a current income tax provision of $2,578,107 and a total deferred tax asset of $1,321,072, but Medifast’s Form 10-K for 2008 reported the current income tax provision as $1,711,000 and a deferred tax expense of $704,000.

10. In fact, both the reported figures for Medifast’s income tax provision in its 2007 and 2008 Forms 10-K and the tax provision calculations prepared by Connors on the Company’s Tax Spreadsheets for those years were wrong, and Medifast’s income tax expense increased significantly... [Emphasis added.]

In other words, the S.E.C. said that Medifast reported a lower income tax provision than was calculated by Connors is 2007 and 2008. Both the reported numbers and calculations ended up to be wrong, but in the end Medifast still understated its income tax expense and materially overstated net income.

Former Medifast CFO Brendan Connors to pay a $40,000 civil penalty to settle Cease-and-Desist Order

Back on November 12, 2012, Medifast disclosed that Brendan N. Connors resigned as its CFO "to pursue other interests." No mention was made of any S.E.C. investigation or possible improper conduct in its press release. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Michael C. MacDonald gave him a nice sendoff stating:

“On behalf of our employees and the Board we would like to thank Brendan for his contributions to the growth of Medifast over the last seven years,” commented Mr. MacDonald. [Emphasis added.]

However, the Cease-and-Desist Order entered against Connors said that:

Connors’ improper conduct resulted in Medifast filing periodic reports with the Commission for the years 2006 through 2008 that materially understated its tax expense and overstated its net income after tax. [Emphasis added.]

Furthermore, the Cease-and-Desist order said that:

...the Commission finds that Connors violated Rule 13b2-1 of the Exchange Act and willfully aided and abetted and was a cause of Medifast’s violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20 and 13a-thereunder. [Emphasis added.]

Connors consented to the entry of a Cease-and Desist Order "without admitting or denying the findings...." The S.E.C. usually settles such actions without an admission or denial. As part of the settlement, he agreed to pay a $40,000 "civil money penalty" and was "...denied the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission." He can request a reinstatement after one year. Connors is a Certified Public Accountant.

Cease-and-Desist Order entered against audit engagement partner Marc G. Nochimson

The Cease-and-Desist order entered against audit engagement partner Marc G. Nochimson, said he:

...engaged in improper professional conduct pursuant to Rule 102(e)(1) by failing, in several instances, to comply with the PCAOB Standards in conducting Medifast’s 2006, 2007 and 2008 financial statement audits.... [Emphasis added.]

Nochimson consented to the entry of a Cease-and Desist Order "without admitting or denying the findings...." The S.E.C. usually settles such actions without an admission or denial. As part of the settlement, Nochimson was "denied the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant." He can request a reinstatement after one year.

Marc G. Nochimson was a partner at Bagell, Josephs, Levine & Company LLC, Medifast's former auditors. In January 2010, Bagell, Josephs, Levine combined with Friedman LLP which took over as Medifast's auditors. Nochimson joined Friedman LLP when the firms combined. On April 16, 2010, Medifast dismissed Friedman LLP and hired McGladrey & Pullen, LLP/RSM McGladrey of Baltimore MD to perform audit and tax services.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar


Disclosure

I am a convicted felon and a former CPA. As the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I helped my cousin Eddie Antar and other members of his family mastermind one of the largest securities frauds uncovered during the 1980's. I committed my crimes in cold-blood for fun and profit, and simply because I could. If it weren't for the heroic efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today. I do not want or seek forgiveness for my vicious crimes from my victims. My past sins are unforgivable.

There is a saying, "It takes one to know one." I've done professional work with the FBI, IRS, SEC, Justice Department, and other federal and state law enforcement agencies in training them to identify fraud and catch white-collar criminals. Often, I refer cases to them as an independent whistleblower. I teach white-collar crime classes for various government entities, professional organizations, businesses, and colleges and universities. Recently, I've helped the AICPA Fraud Task Force develop better methods for detecting fraud.

I do not own any Medifast securities long or short.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Unusual Timing of Medifast Auditor Resignation Announcement

Updated to include certain corrections

Today, Medifast (NYSE: MED) announced that Bagell, Josephs, Levine & Company, LLC (BJL) resigned effective January 22, 2010 as the company's independent auditors. BJL had merged with Friedman LLP on January 1, 2010 and Friedman was engaged as Medifast's new auditors. The company claims that:

During the two years ended December 31, 2008 and from December 31, 2008 through January 21, 2010, there were no (i) disagreements between the Company and BJL on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to its satisfaction, would have caused BJL to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in connection with its report, or (ii) “reportable events,” as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

On January 25, 2010, Medifast announced its unaudited Q4 2009 financial results, but failed to disclose the resignation of BJL as its auditors and Friedman taking over as the company's auditors, three days earlier. That day, the stock shot up $2.36 to close at $21.24 per share. Would the stock have popped up if investors knew what Medifast already knew three days earlier? Before I initially posted my blog today at 2:16 PM ET, Medifast's stock was down $2.10 per share and trading at $18.43 per share in reaction to BJL resigning and Friedman LLP taking over as auditors.

Note: In an earlier version of this blog post, I neglected to mention that Friedman succeeded BJL as Medifast's auditors due to my misreading of the company's 8-K and I apologize for the error.

Disclosure:

I am a convicted felon and a former CPA. As the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I helped Eddie Antar and other members of his family mastermind one of the largest securities frauds uncovered during the 1980's. I committed my crimes, simply because I could.

If it weren't for the efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today.

I do not own Medifast securities short or long. From time-to-time, I do research on scam companies for Fraud Discovery Institute which has been critical of Medifast's business model and financial disclosures. Barry Minkow is a short seller.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Open Memo to Medifast Chief Executive and CFO Michael S. McDevitt: Cut the BS and Address Troubling Issues Raised by Barry Minkow

See update at bottom of blog post

Open Memo to Medifast Chief Executive and CFO Michael S. McDevitt:

I read Medifast’s (NYSE: MED) self-serving proclamations attacking my friend convicted felon turned fraud fighter Barry Minkow (co-founder of Fraud Discovery Institute or FDI) in both its Q3 2009 10-Q issued last November and reiterated in today’s press release detailed in part below:

An Independent Committee composed of distinguished members of the Board of Directors of Medifast, Inc. (NYSE: MED) was constituted in February, 2009 to review public allegations of a third party, convicted felon Barry Minkow, and his network of alleged independent experts, posted on Minkow's website alleging illegal activities of Take Shape For Life, Inc., a direct selling company and a subsidiary of Medifast, Inc.

The independent Directors' Committee, after investigation of facts and information concluded the allegations were false, misleading, and/or without merit. The same is true for the re-issue of the report posted January 8, 2010 – the allegations are false, misleading, and/or without merit.

The company has made a formal complaint to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the Maryland Securities Commissioner.

Note: I added links to Fraud Discovery's Medifraud.net web site and reports for clarity.

While Medifast's so-called “independent” directors may meet the legal tests of independence under New York Stock Exchange rules as you claim, they are certainly less independent than Bagell, Josephs, Levine & Company, the company's so-called independent auditors. Each director holds stock or stock options in Medifast, unlike the company's auditors who cannot own stock in an audit client (Source: Medifast Proxy Statement dated August 25, 2009). In any case, your auditors seem to have their own share of independence and competency issues, too (detailed here).

However, Medifast is attempting in smear Barry Minkow because he has publicly disclosed that he is a short seller and his company Fraud Discovery Institute has issued various reports raising serious issues about Medifast's questionable financial disclosures, business model, and marketing practices backed up with an outside expert's report and other data made fully available to the public for examination. According to Fraud Discovery's recent rebuttal:

According to FDI Co-Founder Barry Minkow, “there is only one problem with the above statement. Neither FDI nor myself made the detailed allegations in previous reports released on the official FDI website. On the contrary, FDI sought the outside opinion of nationally recognized, multi-level marketing expert Robert Fitzpatrick, who has testified for law enforcement on numerous occasions about these kinds of schemes. Mr. Fitzpatrick is not a short-seller and has never had a financial interest in Medifast’s stock at any time nor would Mr. Fitzpatrick, for the nominal fee paid for his analysis of the Medifast business model, make up out of thin air the specific problems inherent with the company.

In contrast, Medifast has utterly failed to issue any detailed line-by-line rebuttal of any issues raised in Fraud Discovery Institute's reports concerning the company. Simply disclosing that Medifast issued a “formal complaint to securities regulators” without issuing a detailed public rebuttal of FDI's reports seems like an attempt to scare off Minkow with threats of a government investigation, rather than transparently address the serious issues raised in those reports. In addition, I remind you that Barry Minkow has a first amendment right to critique your company, notwithstanding the fact that he publicly disclosed that he holds a short position in your company and is a convicted felon.

Back in November 2008, Medifast claimed that it made a “formal complaint to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the Maryland Securities Commissioner.” However, Barry Minkow informs me that he has not been contacted by either regulator regarding your formal complaints.

I can assure you that Barry Minkow would welcome scrutiny from any regulator along with their concurrent scrutiny of Medifast’s questionable financial disclosures, business model, and marketing practices. Minkow is unafraid to defend FDI's detailed case that your company is a scam preying on the hopes and dreams of thousands of unsuspecting gullible people who buy into your multi-level marketing scheme, never to collect any net profits on their investments.

Here’s a suggestion. Why don’t you publicly debate Barry Minkow in front of TV cameras (without lawyers to sanitize your communications) about the issues raised in his reports? In other words, cut the BS and show some balls: put up or shut up.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar

Leading securities litigation law firm Barack, Rodos, & Bacine announced that it is investigating Medifast's financial disclosures for possible violations of federal securities law as a result of reports issued by Fraud Discovery Institute. Read the press release here.

Suggested reading:

Fraud Files Blog: Medifast multi-level marketing scheme called into question by expert

Disclosure:

I am a convicted felon and a former CPA. As the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I helped Eddie Antar and other members of his family mastermind one of the largest securities frauds uncovered during the 1980's. I committed my crimes, simply because I could.

If it weren't for the efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today.

I do not own Medifast securities short or long. From time-to-time, I do research on scam companies for Fraud Discovery Institute. However, this open letter is an unsolicited freebie. In any case, please feel free to add my name to any allegations you make to securities regulators and see if I give a damn.