Skip to main content

Is Green Mountain Coffee's Inventory Approaching Toxic Levels?

In four of the last five quarters since the beginning of fiscal year 2011, Green Mountain Coffee’s (NASDAQ: GMCR) reported revenues exceeded the revenue guidance it gave investors just weeks before the close of each quarter. In those quarters, its inventory turnover should have increased compared to the same quarter of the previous year because it delivered more products than anticipated to its customers before the close of each quarter to meet unexpected excess demand. Instead, Green Mountain Coffee’s inventory turns decreased, reflecting a longer time to sell its inventory despite reporting revenues that exceeded it projections.

Furthermore, in every quarter since the start of fiscal year 2011, Green Mountain Coffee's inventory turns have increased when each quarter’s numbers are compared to the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. It's taking Green Mountain Coffee longer to sell its inventory when you compare each quarter to the same quarter of the previous fiscal year.

See the chart below and calculations here. Click on image to enlarge:

Additional Note: The yellow highlighted areas are periods when Green Mountain Coffee's revenues exceeded projections its projections. I compared each quarter to its previous year comparable quarter. For example, the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 (quarter ended December 24, 2011) was compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 (quarter ended December 25, 2010). Dollar amounts in $000s.

On September 20, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission started a probe of Green Mountain Coffee’s accounting practices. Afterwards, the company restated its financial reports from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2010 to correct certain violations of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Those violations caused the company to overstate its reported earnings in previous fiscal years.

A class action lawsuit was filed against the company that cited information provided by over a dozen informants who allege that it manipulated earnings and committed securities fraud in fiscal year 2010 and prior years. The amended complaint cites certain forensic accounting analysis provided in this blog detailing violations of accounting rules by the company before and after the S.E.C. started its probe. In addition, it cites a scathing report issued by money manager David Einhorn and analysis provided in other financial blogs.

Excessive increases in inventory levels coupled with declining inventory turnover are generally considered to be a red flag for possible inflation of inventory numbers and overstatements of earnings among forensic accountants. In every quarter after the S.E.C. started probing Green Mountain Coffee's accounting practices, its inventory turns have decreased reflecting longer periods to sell its product, even in quarters where its revenues exceeded its projections.

For example, on November 9, 2011, 46 days into the 91 day first quarter of fiscal year 2012, Green Mountain Coffee projected a revenue increase of 85% to 90% over the previous fiscal year’s comparable quarter. The company later reported that its revenues increased 101.7% to $1.158 billion in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 compared to $574.148 million reported in the previous fiscal year first quarter. Its first quarter fiscal year 2012 revenues exceeded its low end guidance by $67.335 million and it exceeded its high end guidance by $96.042 million.

Based on Green Mountain Coffee's gross profit on revenues of 29.1% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, it delivered an estimated extra $68 million of product (at cost) above its low end guidance or $48 million of product (at cost) above its high end guidance to meet unexpected excess customer demand. However, its inventory increased 125.2% to $606.679 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 compared to only $262.132 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2011.

Green Mountain Coffee’s inventory turns decreased to 1.28 times in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 compared 1.62 times in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. It took an average of 70.83 days for the company to sell its inventory in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 compared to 56.17 days in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 (14.66 days or 26% longer to sell its inventory).

Two years ago, in the quarter ended December 26, 2009, it took Green Mountain Coffee an average of only 45.43 days to sell its inventory. It took 25.40 days longer (a 56% longer period of time) for Green Mountain Coffee to sell its inventory in the quarter ended December 24, 2011 compared to the quarter ended December 26, 2009.

Does Green Mountain Coffee Roasters have a problem managing its inventory levels or is the company inflating its inventories to overstate its reported profits as alleged in the class action lawsuit? The S.E.C. probe of the company is ongoing.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar


I am a convicted felon and a former CPA. As the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I helped my cousin Eddie Antar and other members of his family mastermind one of the largest securities frauds uncovered during the 1980's. I committed my crimes in cold-blood for fun and profit, and simply because I could. If it weren't for the heroic efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today.

There is a saying, "It takes one to know one." Today, I work very closely with the FBI, IRS, SEC, Justice Department, and other federal and state law enforcement agencies in training them to identify and catch white-collar criminals. Often, I refer cases to them as an independent whistleblower. I teach white-collar crime classes for various government entities, professional organizations, businesses, and colleges and universities. I do not seek or want forgiveness for my vicious crimes from my victims. My past sins are unforgivable.

I do not own any Green Mountain Coffee Roasters securities long or short.


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…