Skip to main content

Green Mountain Coffee Roasters: Do they know how to count the beans?

Updated at 5:35 PM and 12:42 AM (5/5), please see bottom of post for additional issues

Does anyone at Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (NASDAQ: GMCR) know math or accounting? Seriously, does anyone in their accounting department know how to count the beans?

On September 28, 2010, Green Mountain Coffee disclosed that the SEC started an informal inquiry into its accounting practices eight days earlier. On that same day, the company reported an accounting error involving its K-Cup margin percentages. On November 19, 2010, Green Mountain Coffee disclosed four new accounting errors. On that date, the company said it would restate its financial reports issued from 2007 to the quarter ended 2010 to correct its errors.

Before the restatement of accounting errors, Green Mountain Coffee issued a 10-Q report for the quarter ended December 26, 2009 and disclosed the following financial results for Timothy’s:
For the thirteen-weeks ended December 26, 2009, Timothy’s contributed approximately $7,141,000 in revenue and $902,000 of income before taxes.
After the restatement of financial reports, Green Mountain Coffee issued a 10-Q report for the quarter ended December 25, 2010 and disclosed the following revised financial results for Timothy’s in 2009:
For the thirteen weeks ended December 26, 2009, the Timothy’s acquisition resulted in an additional $4.1 million of revenue and $0.0 million of income before income taxes.
[Emphasis added.]
Yesterday, Green Mountain Coffee issued its 10-Q report for the quarter ended March 26, 2011 and reported the following financial results for Timothy's from the previous fiscal year:
For the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2010, the Timothy’s operations contributed an additional $13.0 million of revenue and $3.8 million of income before taxes. [Emphasis added.]
Maybe they need a calculator?
Therefore, for the twenty six weeks ended March 27, 2010, Timothy's operations should have contributed an additional $3.8 million of income before taxes ($0.0 million of income before income taxes for thirteen weeks ended December 26, 2009 plus $3.8 million of income before taxes for the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2010). Right?

In that same 10-Q report for the quarter ended March 26, 2011, Green Mountain Coffee reported the following financial results for Timothy's for the previous twenty-six weeks ended March 27, 2010:
...Timothy’s operations contributed in an additional $17.2 million of revenue and $2.8 million of income before income taxes. [Emphasis added.]
Green Mountain Coffee's numbers for Timothy's don't add up. Timothy's Income for before taxes for the twenty-six weeks ended March 27, 2010 should be $3.8 million, not $2.8 million if you add up the numbers for each thirteen-week period. Did Green Mountain Coffee make a mathematical error or did the company find a new error in the quarter ended December 26, 2009 that was not found in its previous restatement of financial reports?

Green Mountain Coffee revises its reconciliation of its GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income to comply with Regulation G

At least Green Mountain Coffee corrected its presentation of net income to non-GAAP net income to comply with SEC Regulation G, as I recommended in a February 13, 2011 blog post.

In its 10-Q report for the quarter ended December 25, 2010, Green Mountain presented the following reconciliation of its GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income:


In my February 2011 blog post, I pointed out that:
According to Regulation G, Green Mountain's non-GAAP net income is required to be reconciled to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, which in this case is GAAP net income. Accordingly, Green Mountain showed how its non-GAAP net income did not include acquisition-related expenses, SEC inquiry expenses, and amortization of identifiable intangibles. However, according to SEC Regulation G Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, Green Mountain cannot provide side-by-side reconciliations of GAAP and non-GAAP numbers in such a way that it presents a full non-GAAP income statement. See below:
Question 102.10
Question: Is it appropriate to present a full non-GAAP income statement for purposes of reconciling non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures?
Answer: Generally, no. Presenting a full non-GAAP income statement may attach undue prominence to the non-GAAP information. [Jan. 11, 2010].
In addition, I alerted the SEC about Green Mountain Coffee's violation of Regulation G.

In its 10-Q report for the quarter ended March 26, 2011, Green Mountain Coffee revised its reconciliation of GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income and no longer presented a full non-GAAP income statement. See below:


I've just started reviewing Green Mountain Coffee's latest 10-Q report and found even more troubling disclosures which I hope to detail soon.

Updated concerns

One issue that I am curious about is Green Mountain Coffee's costs related to the SEC inquiry and defending class-action lawsuits against the company. In the quarter ended December 26, 2010, it spent $5.989 million (pre-tax) in legal fees and other expenses and in the latest quarter ended March 26, 2011, it spent only $0.405 million (pre-tax). Under accrual basis accounting, expenses are recognized when incurred, not when paid. Below are my questions:

Question 1: Did Green Mountain Coffee pay sizable retainers to lawyers, accountants, and other experts in the quarter ended December 26, 2010 and expense the full amount in that quarter, rather than record them as a prepaid expense (asset) and expense those costs, as incurred, against income in future accounting periods?

Question 2: Did Green Mountain Coffee offset those costs with possible reimbursements from its D & O insurance carriers (assuming it has coverage)?

Question 3: If Green Mountain has insurance coverage, but did not accrue any possible insurance reimbursements, why didn't it disclose a gain contingency?

Written by:

Sam E. Antar

Disclosure

I am a convicted felon and a former CPA. As the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I helped my cousin Eddie Antar and other members of his family mastermind one of the largest securities frauds uncovered during the 1980's. I committed my crimes in cold-blood for fun and profit, and simply because I could.

If it weren't for the heroic efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today.

There is a saying, "It takes one to know one." Today, I work very closely with the FBI, IRS, SEC, Justice Department, and other federal and state law enforcement agencies in training them to identify and catch white-collar criminals. Often, I refer cases to them as an independent whistleblower. I teach about white-collar crime for professional organizations, businesses, and colleges and universities.

Recently, I exposed GAAP violations by Overstock.com which caused the company to restate its financial reports for the third time in three years. The SEC is now investigating Overstock.com and its CEO Patrick Byrne for securities law violations (Details here, here, and here).

I do not seek or want forgiveness for my vicious crimes from my victims. I plan on frying in hell with other white-collar criminals for a very long time.

I do not own any Green Mountain Coffee Roasters or Overstock.com securities long or short. My investigations of these companies are a freebie for securities regulators to get me into heaven, though I doubt I will ever get there. My past sins are unforgivable.

Comments

Good finds Sam! I've been keeping a close eye on GMCR recently. A lot of their numbers (from a financial rather than accounting) perspective are very troubling.
Jeremy Lichtman said…
Never mind that they're trading at around 100 P/E (it was up to 150 recently).

I like their coffee, but wouldn't buy their stock.
Always True said…
they do not need to know how to count them, they do different business
Jonathan said…
Where did you find the restated quarterly report?
Before the restatement of accounting errors, Green Mountain Coffee issued a 10-Q report for the quarter ended December 26, 2009 and disclosed the following financial results for Timothy’s:

"For the thirteen-weeks ended December 26, 2009, Timothy’s contributed approximately $7,141,000 in revenue and $902,000 of income before taxes.

After the restatement of financial reports, Green Mountain Coffee issued a 10-Q report for the quarter ended December 25, 2010 and disclosed the following revised financial results for Timothy’s in 2009."

I was looking, but only saw a restatement for the period ending in December 26, 2009.

Thanks for analysis.
Jonathan said…
Where did you find the restated quarterly financial statements?

I looked on their investor page and the restated 10Q is only 10 pages with a note about their internal controls and officer declarations. Where can I find a copy of the restated financials?
Sam E. Antar said…
Jonathan:

On November 19, 2010, Green Mountain Coffee disclosed that it was restating its financial reports because of certain material accounting errors.

See 8-K report here:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/909954/000119312510265256/dex991.htm

More details in 10-K report here:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/909954/000119312510277481/d10k.htm

Regards,

Sam

Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had …

Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that Overstock.com CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…