Skip to main content

More Nepotism and Undisclosed Shady Related Party Transactions Found at InterOil

In his second installment in a series of reports detailing undisclosed shady related party transactions by InterOil (NYSE: IOC) insiders, iBusiness Reporting investigative blogger William Lobdell takes aim at certain transactions between the company and Direct Employment Services Corp (DESC).

Note: iBusiness Reporting is a division of Fraud Discovery Institute. Convicted felon Barry Minkow (co-founder of Fraud Discovery) and former LA Times investigative reporter William Lobdell have publicly disclosed holding short positions in InterOil securities. As a successful fraud investigator, Minkow has uncovered over $1.8 million of fraud involving over twenty companies and has received an official commendation from the FBI for his work in uncovering crime. Minkow and I are close personal friends and I do research work for Fraud Discovery on InterOil, but I do not own any securities in InterOil, long or short.

According to Lobdell, InterOil did not disclose that Christian Vinson who owned 50% of DESC, was the brother-in-law of InterOil CEO Phil Mulacek and Phil's brother Pierre Mulacek was a vice president and director of the company. See excerpt of Lobdell's report below:
...over three years ending in 2005, InterOil paid Direct Employment Services Corp. (DESC) nearly $1.8 million for unspecified "services" for "executive officers and senior management." InterOil disclosed that 50% of DESC was owned by InterOil's then-chief operating officer and director, Christian Vinson.

But InterOil didn't reveal other related-party facts. First, Christian Vinson is Phil Mulacek's brother-in-law. Vinson, who has been with InterOil from the beginning, is now executive vice president of corporate development and government affairs, in charge of dealing with Papua New Guinea's corrupt government.
Was it nepotism or experience that landed Vinson the executive and director positions of an oil-and-gas exploration company? His previous job was manager of a modest, automated machine shop in suburban Chicago.

Also, InterOil didn't disclose that Phil's brother, Pierre Mulacek, was DESC's vice president and director (according to Texas corporate filings) for the three years InterOil spent $1.8 million with DESC.
In filings, DECS listed its headquarters in the same building as InterOil's corporate headquarters outside of Houston.

(In 2005, when Pierre Mulacek served as DESC vice president and director, InterOil purchased DESC for $1,000. Two former DESC executives now hold top posts at InterOil. Bill Jasper, InterOil’s president and chief operating officer, served as vice president of DESC. Another former DESC vice president, Collin Visaggio, is InterOil's chief financial officer. On InterOil's website, the biographies of Vinson, Jasper and Visaggio don't mention their work at DESC.)
Note: Bold print and italics added by me.
Apparently, InterOil insiders are apparently treating this publicly traded company as a personal piggy bank by engaging in a series of undisclosed transactions for the personal enrichment of themselves and relatives at the expense of company shareholders, going back to 1997. Minkow has called InterOil a "Tyco equivalent" while I have said that the company's acts of nepotism remind me of the Antar family who fraudulently ran Crazy Eddie, back in the day.

Lobdell has traced a consistent pattern of nepotism at InterOil going back to the founding of the company. See the chart below (Click on image to enlarge):

In other blog posts, I have detailed how InterOil's disclosures to investors in various reports were contradicted by other disclosures made by the company and insiders in various court cases. In other words, InterOil apparently made certain false disclosures to investors in violation of SEC Rule 10b-5 which prohibits false and misleading disclosures.

In a June 2009 blog post entitled, "InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme," I detailed how InterOil filed a false report with the Securities and Exchange Commission claiming that the company paid no fees for a private placement $95 million convertible debt offering. However, documents submitted in another court case reveal that Clarion Finanz (a major shareholder of InterOil) had in fact received $5.7 million in fees, contrary to InterOil's SEC filings.

In another blog post, entitled, "Did InterOil Commit Securities Fraud?" I detailed how CEO Phil Mulacek made sworn statements in that court case which conflicted with InterOil's financial disclosures to investors. In his sworn court testimony, Mulacek claimed that a $50 million judgment against InterOil would bankrupt the company, while InterOil's financial disclosures to investors claimed that a judgment in excess of $125 million would have a material adverse impact on the company.

Written by

Sam E. Antar


I am a convicted felon and a former CPA. As the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I helped Eddie Antar and other members of his family mastermind one of the largest securities frauds uncovered during the 1980's. I committed my crimes for fun and profit and simply because I could.

If it weren't for the efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today.

I do research on InterOil for Fraud Discovery Institute. However, I do not own any InterOil securities, short or long.

I am planning to go straight to hell for my unforgivable crimes and I expect to meet InterOil CEO Phil Mulacek and some of his cronies there, too.


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…