Skip to main content

Is InterOil Another Tyco or Crazy Eddie?

iBusiness Reporting investigative blogger William Lobdell has published the first installment in a series of reports detailing undisclosed shady related party transactions by InterOil (NYSE: IOC) insiders that apparently include such favorable terms to enrich their relatives at the expense of company shareholders.

In an accompanying press release, Fraud Discovery Institute (co-founded by convicted felon turned fraud buster Barry Minkow) compared InterOil's related party transactions to another well known fraud involving Tyco years ago and is asking the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate the company for possible misconduct. The undisclosed InterOil related party transactions detailed by Lobdell remind me of how the Antar family treated Crazy Eddie as a personal piggy bank, back in my criminal CFO days.

Note: iBusiness Reporting is a division of Fraud Discovery Institute. Both Barry Minkow and William Lobdell have publicly disclosed holding short positions in InterOil securities. I do research for Fraud Discovery on InterOil, but I do not own any securities in InterOil, long or short.

In March 2010, William Lobdell went to a Texas courthouse to examine documents filed in a certain litigation by the original investors of InterOil against CEO Phil Mulacek alleging fraud by him dating as far back as 1997. In his first report, Lobdell found documents backing up allegations by investors of InterOil CEO Phil Mulacek engaging in "self-dealing and secret alliances" to enrich himself and other family members at the expense of InterOil's original investors. Details of Lobdell's follow up reports can be found here and here.

In his first part of a new three part series, William Lobdell describes the lurid details of five shady undisclosed related party transactions involving InterOil insiders and their family members from 2001 to 2004 (full details of Lobdell's report here).

Undisclosed Related Party Transactions

Fraud Discovery's press release summarizes certain related party transactions and reminds us of the infamous Tyco fraud:
...iBusiness Reporting unwinds four InterOil transactions involving the relatives of director Gaylen Byker which include a multi-million-dollar deal with an investment group headed by Byker’s brother and a two-month loan from Byker’s brother that was repaid with what penciled out to be 67.5% annual interest.
The report also includes a $12.3 million investment from a mysterious company based in the Barbados that used the same mailing address and attorney as InterOil Corp.


“The information shows a clear pattern of fraud by InterOil,” said Barry Minkow, co-founder of the Fraud Discovery Institute. “Once or twice might be generously characterized as an honest mistake. But iBusiness Reporting has collected many blatant examples of undisclosed nepotism by InterOil.

“In our opinion, there is no difference between Frank Walsh, who plead guilty to securities fraud, wrongly receiving a $20 million payment from Tyco while serving on the board as an independent director and Gaylen Byker’s self dealing at Interoil.”
Other Troubling Financial Reporting Issues at InterOil

In my June 2009 blog post entitled, "InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme," I detailed how InterOil filed a false report with the Securities and Exchange Commission claiming that the company paid no fees for a private placement $95 million convertible debt offering. However, documents submitted in another court case reveal that Clarion Finanz (a major shareholder of InterOil) had in fact received $5.7 million in fees, contrary to InterOil's SEC filings.

InterOil CEO Phil Mulacek
In another blog post, entitled, "Did InterOil Commit Securities Fraud?" I detailed how CEO Phil Mulacek made sworn statements in that court case which conflicted with InterOil's financial disclosures to investors. In his sworn court testimony, Mulacek claimed that a $50 million judgment against InterOil would bankrupt the company, while InterOil's financial disclosures to investors claimed that a judgment in excess of $125 million would have a material adverse impact on the company.

In both of the situations cited above, InterOil told one story to investors in its SEC filings and financial reports and its management told a conflicting story to the courts in sworn statements. If one story is true, the other story simply cannot be true. In each of the cases cited above, InterOil misrepresented or omitted material information in its financial reports to investors, as evidenced by its management's conflicting disclosures to the courts.

Closing Comments

Beware of fraud, whenever public company insiders deceptively treat their company's resources as a personal piggy bank at the expense of other shareholders and their company has a consistent pattern of contradictory financial disclosures. Phil Mulacek and his cronies at InterOil remind me more and more of the Antar family, including myself, in the infamous Crazy Eddie fraud.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar

Recommended Reading:

William K. Wolfrum: InterOil A (unreported) family affair?


I am a convicted felon and a former CPA. As the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I helped Eddie Antar and other members of his family mastermind one of the largest securities frauds uncovered during the 1980's. I committed my crimes for fun and profit and simply because I could.

If it weren't for the efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today.

I do research on InterOil for Fraud Discovery Institute. However, I do not own any InterOil securities, short or long.

I am planning to go straight to hell for my unforgivable crimes and I expect to meet InterOil CEO Phil Mulacek there, too.


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…