Skip to main content

Indicted Former Democratic Assemblyman Louis Manzo Would be Wise to Stop Blabbing and Simply Shut Up

Perhaps the smartest thing an elected politician needs to learn is when to simply shut up and stop blabbing, especially if that politician is under federal indictment and awaiting trial. Indicted former Democratic Assemblyman and unsuccessful mayoral candidate for Jersey City Louis Manzo does not seem to understand that fighting a criminal indictment is not a political campaign. There is a saying, "The cover up is always more risky than the crime" because public statements made in defense of allegations to a crime, usually land that person in deeper trouble with prosecutors and investigators and rarely help their chances for an acquittal.
Indicted former Assemblyman Louis Manzo holds a press conference

Whether innocent or guilty, the best course of action for any indicted person is to save their arguments for the Judge and jury. A simple straight forward statement saying, "In America there is a presumption of innocence and I look forward to contesting those charges at trial" is usually the wisest course of action for any Defendant awaiting a criminal trial.

Louis Manzo held a press conference and angrily attacked former US Attorney, now New Jersey Governor, Chistopher Christie accusing him of orchestrating a massive federal probe into corruption and money laundering to help his political campaign to become Governor of New Jersey. A spokesman for Governor Christie called Manzo's accusations "deluded."

Massive federal sting operation

Last summer, Louis Manzo and his brother Ronald was arrested and charged with accepting $27,500 in illegal campaign contributions from undercover government informant Solomon Dwek, who posed as a crooked developer trying to gain building approvals for his projects.

In May 2006, real estate developer Solomon Dwek was arrested for bank fraud after he bounced a $25 million on PNC bank and tried to deposit another rubber $25 million check with the bank. Dwek agreed to cooperate with the FBI and wore a wire as a confidential government informant in its wide ranging investigation of political corruption in New Jersey and money laundering involving religious charities and New York and New Jersey.

In July 2009, 44 people including 3 New Jersey Mayors, about two dozen other politicians including members of their staffs, several government employees, and 5 Rabbis from the Brooklyn, New York and Deal, New Jersey Syrian Jewish Community were arrested as part of the two year federal massive sting operation.

In February 2010, former Jersey Deputy Mayor Leona Beldini was convicted of two felonies in the first trial of a Jersey public official as a result of the federal probe.

Other Defendants are awaiting trial, some Defendants have already pleaded guilty, and according to sources, other Defendants are quietly cooperating with the FBI in its expanding probe into corruption, money laundering, and tax evasion.

Louis Manzo attacks FBI and federal prosecutors

According to an article in the Star-Ledger by Joe Ryan:

So there he was today, standing before a bank of microphones at a news conference he called in Jersey City to assail the federal authorities who charged him.

Manzo accused the FBI and federal prosecutors in Newark of orchestrating last summer’s sprawling bribery and money-laundering operation to catapult former U.S. Attorney Chris Christie, a Republican, to the governor’s office. As proof, Manzo cited contributions from staffers at the U.S. Attorney’s office to Christie’s campaign. And he cited the dozen-plus former federal prosecutors who have since joined Christie’s administration.

"I think it’s obvious when you connect the dots that there was an attempt to use a government sting as an effort to help Christie’s election," Manzo said.

A spokesman for the governor said Manzo’s accusations were "deluded."
"He appears to be just another official in New Jersey charged with corruption who wants to divert attention from his own conduct," said Michael Drewniak, a former spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Newark who now works for Christie. "Maybe at his next press event, he could go into full detail about his conduct as described in the charges."
Christie’s successor, U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman, said Manzo "can rehash whatever allegations he wants. But this office stands behind the indictment, and the charges against him will be resolved in court."

A spokesman for the FBI declined to comment.


"This is an assault on the Constitution," Manzo said.

Manzo is not the first defendant to accuse federal prosecutors of trying to aide Christie’s election. Former Democratic state Sen. Joseph Coniglio of Bergen County unsuccessfully argued during his corruption trial last year that he was the victim of a political prosecution. A federal judge barred former Jersey City Deputy Mayor Leona Beldini from using a similar tact at her trial in February.

Manzo is, however, the first defendant in recent memory to stage a news conference to trumpet his accusation. His lawyer, John David Lynch, did not attend the event. Reached by phone afterward, he said normally he would advise against such public statements. But Manzo, he said, felt generally aggrieved.

"He is an intelligent and responsible adult," Lynch said. "I am not a puppet master."

Perhaps John David Lynch, Manzo's attorney can advise his client that you rarely win a federal criminal corruption case on emotion and blabbing about being victimized by government prosecutors. The wisest way to win such a criminal case is by unemotionally and methodically attacking the evidence and raising "reasonable doubt" as to guilt with a jury.

Public displays of anger by Defendants only serve to energize prosecutors and criminal investigators to "cross every t and dot every i" and otherwise double-up in their efforts to successfully win their cases. Keeping a low profile usually draws less attention from the feds.

Louis Manzo's indictment cites several damaging conversations involving himself, his brother, and government informant Solomon Dwek caught on tape discussing alleged illegal payments in return for helping Dwek gain approval for his building projects. Apparently, Manzo feels "boxed in" and is unable to refute the overwhelming evidence cited in his indictment and feels his only course of action is to make angry attacks on the FBI and US Attorney's office.

Louis Manzo seems like another criminal Defendant who is "living on hope." Manzo should not treat his upcoming trial like a political campaign. At least politicians can walk away after losing a political campaign to fight another day, unlike losing a criminal trial and landing themselve's in the slammer.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar

Related blog post:

First Jury Trial in Federal Corruption Probe Based on Informant Solomon Dwek Convicts Beldini: Are Some Defendants Living on Hope?

Previous media coverage of my comments on the ongoing an expanding federal investigation into political corruption and money laundering can be found here:

July 22, 2009: Jewish Week - UPDATED: Syrian Jewish Insider: “Not Surprised” by Arrest of Prominent Rabbis in Breaking FBI Investigation

July 24, 2009: New York Times - Brooklyn Blogs Buzzing With Talk About Rabbis by Paul Vitello

August 17, 2009: Atlantic City Press - Crazy Eddie's cousin stars in Republican hearing on corruption by Derek Harper

August 3, 2009: Bloomberg News - Money-Laundering Rabbi Case in Los Angeles Echoes N.J. Scandal by Linda Sandler and Voreacos

August 26, 2009: Jewish Daily Forward - ‘Crazy’ Eddie’s Cousin, a Former Fraudster, Speaks Out on Syrian ‘Subculture of Crime’ by Rebecca Dube


I am a convicted felon and a former CPA. As the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie, I helped Eddie Antar and other members of his family mastermind one of the largest securities frauds uncovered during the 1980's. I committed my crimes, simply because I could.

If it weren't for the efforts of the FBI, SEC, Postal Inspector's Office, US Attorney's Office, and class action plaintiff's lawyers who investigated, prosecuted, and sued me, I would still be the criminal CFO of Crazy Eddie today.

After two years of stonewalling government investigations, class action litigations brought by our victims, and lying to my former attorneys, I hired criminal attorney Anthony Mautone and civil attorney Jonathan D. Warner. They correctly advised me to cooperate with the government and the victims of my crimes, rather than risk a trial.

As a result of Mautone's and Warner's wise advice, I was sentenced to only six months of house arrest, 1,200 hours of community service, and paid some nominal fines and disgorgement. In addition, in my settlement with the victims of my crimes, I avoided all civil liability due to my cooperation in helping them recover over $100 million dollars in losses.

Today, I teach the Justice Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internal Revenue Service, and other federal, state, and local government agencies about white collar crime, completely free of charge. I hope it gets me into heaven, but I doubt that I will ever get there because my crimes are unforgivable.


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…