Skip to main content under Siege from Investigations and Lawsuits (NASDAQ: BIDZ) which is already under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission into its inventory accounting practices and is being sued for alleged shill bidding on its web site, is now facing several class action lawsuits alleging securities fraud and a new investigation by the Federal Trade Commission into its email marketing practices.

Last week, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine and Sarraf Gentile filed a class action lawsuit alleging securities fraud by and David Zinberg (CEO and President), based on issues raised in reports by short seller Citron Research (details of Citron reports here and here):

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued a series of false and misleading statements intended to project the picture of a financially sound and well-operating company, when, in fact, the company was operating with material deficiencies and undisclosed substantial problems that went to the heart of its business model. On November 26, 2007, a Citron Research article identified numerous "red flags" and revealed previously undisclosed material problems with the Company. Two days later Citron issued a second article that provided additional details, revealing, among other things, that the Company engaged improper business tactics in order to artificially raise the auction price of its products. On this news, the Company's stock price dropped from a closing price of $19.94 on Friday, November 23, 2007, to a low of $10.10 on November 28, a loss of nearly 50%.

Note: Download lawsuit here.

In a press release, said that it "believes the plaintiffs' claims are entirely without merit and intends to defend the action vigorously." However, the company also disclosed that it "recently received a Civil Investigative Demand for information from the Federal Trade Commission relating to email marketing practices."

In February 2009, the SEC started investigating's inventory accounting practices and disclosures after I alerted them to possible violations of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in accounting for inventories.

In August 2008, a class action lawsuit was filed against and certain members of its management, alleging that the "defendants have materially misrepresented the goods sold through the web site and are involved in a systematic program of shill bidding."

Advice to founder, CEO, and President David Zinberg

Be careful in selecting legal counsel and monitoring legal costs. Most white collar defense lawyers will defend your company to its last dollar and you to your last dollar.

Insist on detailed itemized billing with full documentation of costs. However, many law firms will even charge you for preparing invoices.

Watch out for document copying charges and pass along costs, such as those costs for sending legal staff home by car service due to overtime work on your account. Expert fees will eat any company alive, too.

Finally, it is a tossup over who is a worse opponent: Motivated government lawyers with almost infinite resources at their disposal or those bloodhound class action lawyers with a profit motive, representing clients screaming for justice.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar (a convicted felon and former CFO of Crazy Eddie)


I do not own any securities, long or short.


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

Suggested Reading: Hatchet Man Judd Bagley's Downward Spiral: Junkie, Confessed Criminal, Admitted Adulterer by Sam Antar (here), and Closing the File on a Criminal and Junkie Named Judd Bagley by Gary Weiss (here)

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic commen…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…