Skip to main content

What Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff Does Not Want Anyone to Know

One of the many divisions reporting to Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff is the Tax and Revenue Division. According to the Utah Attorney General’s Office web site, the Tax and Revenue Division:

  • Represents the Tax Commission, Department of Financial Institutions, the Insurance Department and state agencies that issue bonds and
  • Handles tax litigation and bankruptcy.

In particular, the web site boasts that, “Attorneys in the Tax and Revenue Division provide legal support for the [Utah] Tax Commission.” The web site goes on to claim that the Tax Division is “is vigilant about auditing and collecting taxes so honest taxpayers do not have to pay an unfair share of the state's expenses.” In other words, Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff is in charge of all litigation involving the collection of state taxes.

We need to ask, “How diligent Mark Shurtleff is in paying his own taxes in the past?”

From 1990 to 1993, Mark Shurtleff was a private practice trial lawyer in California. Was he starving from practicing law? I ask this question because the State of California imposed a tax lien on him for nonpayment of taxes. That makes him a tax delinquent.

On February 20, 1996, the state of California imposed a tax lien (Case number 96077277) on Mark Shurtleff of $11,093 for back taxes. At least a few months later he was able to scrounge up some bucks have that lien released (Case number 960259624) on May 23, 1996.

By 1996, Mark Shurtleff was the Assistant Attorney General for the State of Utah. Was he making more money as a government official than as a private trial lawyer? Why didn’t he pay his taxes earlier or rather before a tax lien was imposed on him? Apparently, as a government official, he believed that it was time to clean up his act. Not so fast.

Acts of vandalism

As I detailed in a previous blog post, in 1998 Mark Shurtleff decided to run for a position on the Salk Lake City Commission. According to the Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News, police caught him red handed in the act of tearing down his opponent’s campaign signs. Now, as Attorney General for the state of Utah, he posts videos of arrests of criminal suspects on his web site. I wonder how Mark Shurtleff would have felt if the police had videotaped his prior act of vandalism for everyone to see.

Selling favors to contributors

Now, Mark Shurtleff is running for re-election as Utah Attorney General. According to an audio biography on the Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff’s website, “Mark wanted to serve others and make a difference in his life.” True to his word, Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff has abused the integrity of his office to serve the personal interests of certain campaign contributors.

It is perfectly legitimate for companies to donate monies to politicians to help further their political interests. However, it is not legitimate for elected officials to accept large sums of money to do favors for corporate contributors using state resources.

In another blog post, I detailed how Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff colluded with campaign contributor Overstock.com to deliberately defame me because of my exposure and criticism of the company’s misdeeds.

Just a few days after receiving a $5,000 payment from Overstock.com, Mark Shurtleff wrote an “open letter” on his office’s letterhead to Overstock.com that contained outright lies about my agreement to make a free presentation at his 14th Annual White Collar Crime Conference. Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) CEO Patrick Byrne used Shurtleff’s letter in a press release in an attempt to discredit my exposure and criticism of his company’s actions. However, taped recorded conversations with Deputy Attorney General Richard Hamp and Chief Deputy Attorney General Kirk Torgensen completely and categorically rebuffed Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff’s outright lies.

Utah has a statute covering “Criminal Defamation.” It states:

(1) A person is guilty of criminal defamation if he knowingly communicates to any person orally or in writing any information which he knows to be false and knows will tend to expose any other living person to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule.

(2) Criminal defamation is a class B misdemeanor.

Imagine if some Republican in Utah had the courage to go against corruption in their party like Alaska Governor and current Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin did in Alaska. It would be a nice dose of Shurtleff’s own medicine to see him arrested on videotape for corruption.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO and a convicted felon)

Index to all White Collar Fraud blog posts

Other Blog and Media Reaction

Disclosure: No position in Overstock.com securities. Not a Utah resident.

Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had …

Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that Overstock.com CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…