Skip to main content

Open Letter to Patrick Byrne, CEO of

Delivered via email, return receipt requested

To Patrick Byrne (CEO of

I read your latest earnings conference call transcript last Friday for's third quarter of fiscal year 2007. It is my understanding that you now claim to be ready to answer my questions about's financial and other disclosures, its accounting policies, your actions, your lies, your deceptions, your distortions, your deceitful behavior, your despicable conduct, your cronies, and your continued violations of your company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

I quote your comment in the third quarter fiscal year 2007 earnings conference call transcript:

Sam Antar, if you want to join us as an [inter-locketer], I have to stick around -- I have to leave in 15 minutes but I'm hoping you'll join, Sam.

I quote another comment from you:

I have 10:02 -- Sam Antar, are you on the line? Come on, Sam. Okay, I've got to get over to a talk.

Note: Bold print and italics added by me.

I was not even listening to your third quarter conference call and you knew that I was not on the call. I had planned to read the full transcript later in the day. For the previous second quarter conference call, Kevin Moon would not submit my emailed questions because I was a couple of minutes late.

During the most recent third quarter conference call, you apparently agreed to address the questions that I have asked in my blog regarding, your actions, and the actions of persons working in concert with you. Meanwhile, you still have not provided clear, truthful, and unambiguous answers to previous questions that I asked you in our previous email exchanges, my email requests to Kevin Moon, and other questions that I have raised in this blog. Instead, you continue to dodge and evade questions about your company, your actions, and persons working in concert with you, with deflection, smears, grandstanding, and false bravado.

On May 9, 2006, disclosed that the Securities and Exchange Commission started a formal investigation of the company. On May 17, 2006, you received a personal subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, delayed its disclosure of your personal subpoena from the SEC for almost an entire year and disclosed it on May 9, 2007. A day later, on May 10, 2007, you reassured investors and claimed:

...that the heart of the investigation is not, I would suggest, Overstock-centric, but rather, concerns itself with a strange set of relationships among ..... Well, let me just say that the irony here is just delicious.

Note: Bold print and italics added by me.

On August 10, 2007, you admitted to being a target of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, in contrast to your previous denials.

You and other persons working in concert with you have engaged in a consistent and continuous pattern of deceptive and misleading statements about You have conducted a smear campaign with surrogates who use harassment, intimidation, blackmail, threats, anti-Semitism, false accusations, and lies in an effort to silence your critics and other persons who disagree with your paranoid and delusional fantasies and agendas.

You seem to be living under the delusion that a so-called good quarter will absolve, you, and those persons working in concert with you, of any wrongdoing. The issue here is the investigation by the SEC of possible securities law violations by, you, and other persons working in concert with you. If the SEC believes that, you, and other persons working in concert with you have violated other civil and criminal statutes, they often refer those issues to other appropriate government agencies.

I will be in Salt Lake City on October 31, 2007 and plan on meeting with investigators from the Securities and Exchange Commission to discuss issues about, you, and other persons working in concert with you. Since you now claim to be ready to engage me, I invite you to answer my questions in person with me and personnel from the Securities and Exchange Commission at 12 PM local time on October 31, 2007 at their Salt Lake City offices. I will waive my rights to have counsel present and any immunity as I voluntarily discuss with the Securities and Exchange the issue of, you, and other persons working in concert with you.

Will you agree to attend such a meeting and answer questions while waiving your right to have counsel present and any immunity, too? Will you come to such a meeting without any counsel or advisors to guide, coach, and advise you, as I have agreed to do? Let the SEC hear your unfiltered explanations of your despicable behavior, deceitful actions, and misleading disclosures. Will you finally answer questions truthfully, clearly, unambiguously, and without deception about's disclosures, its accounting policies, your lies, your deceptions, your deceit, your distortions, your misleading statements, your despicable behavior, your cronies, and your continued violations of's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, in person with me and investigators from the SEC, without having any person around to coach you?

If you accept my advance invitation, plan on spending the entire day at the SEC, rather than a few minutes that you claim to have allocated during your conference call. If you agree to attend such meeting and answer questions, you are invited to tape record the meeting, since I plan on tape recording my questions and your responses.

You will have your golden opportunity to respond to me in person rather than through email or by telephone conference calls. I am quite sure that the SEC would like to hear your explanations of's disclosures and your deceitful actions without the presence and assistance of any advisors. On May 9, 2006, when the SEC notified of its formal investigation of the company, you claimed to "celebrate" the SEC investigation of I note that's recent 10-Q (page 16) claims:

The Company and Mr. Byrne have responded to these subpoenas and each continues to cooperate with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this matter.

Note: Bold print and italics added by me.

If you have done nothing wrong, really celebrate the SEC investigation, are really willing to cooperate with the SEC in its investigation, and now as you claim you are willing to answer my questions, you will answer such questions from me about, you, and your collaborators in front of persons at the SEC.

If you decline to attend such a meeting and answer my questions, I will assume that your continued failure to address these issues is an admission that I have raised valid points that need to be vigorously pursued by the Securities and Exchange Commission and possibly other government law enforcement agencies. Unlike your belated personal invitation to me to ask questions at your earnings conference call, I am giving you about a week to prepare to face me and personnel from the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, I request a prompt yes or no answer to my invitation by Tuesday, October 23, 2007.


Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

PS: Perhaps, your Director of Communications, Judd Bagley, will agree to a separate meeting with the SEC and me, too? I would be willing to stay an extra day in Salt Lake City to hear his unfiltered explanation of the issues that I have raised with the SEC. I am quite sure that the SEC wants to hear his answers to my questions, without coaching, too.

Christopher Cox, Paul S. Atkins, Kathleen L. Casey, Annette L Nazareth (SEC Commissioners)
Ken Israel, William McKean, and Norman Korb (SEC Utah Office)
Richard Simpson (SEC Washington Office)
Joseph J. Tabacco Jr. and Clay Corbus ( Audit Committee members)
Judd Bagley (Director of Communications at

Index to my blog posts about


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…