Skip to main content

Advice from a convicted felon: How the government investigates and prosecutes white collar criminal cases

I am often asked by people attending my many free fraud presentations about the conduct of government white collar crime investigations. In almost every securities fraud, there is a hierarchy of criminals, which I will call:

  • The big fish (usually the CEO)
  • The middle fish (usually middle managers)
  • The smallest fish (usually non management personnel)

The government works its way up the criminal hierarchy to get to the biggest fish

The government attempts to flip the smallest fish to get to the biggest fish. The investigators usually attempt to use the testimony of the smallest fish to work their way up the ladder to the middle fish and than use the middle fish to catch the biggest fish. The government uses the smallest fish to turn in the middle fish and the middle fish to turn in the biggest fish. Each level of fish is used as bait by the government to reel in the next higher level of fish.

The government would much rather deep fry the biggest fish than either the middle fish or the smallest fish. The government usually considers the smallest fish, small fry. The government expends enormous time and economic resources to investigate and prosecute white collar crimes. As the government works hard, its hunger grows. After so much work by the government, the smallest fish and the middle fish will hardly fill their appetite. The government wants to deep fry the biggest fish.

The Smallest Fish

The smallest fish have to worry about both the middle fish and the biggest fish distancing itself from them. In turn, the middle fish have to worry about the biggest fish distancing itself from both the smallest fish and the middle fish. The smallest fish need to worry about both the middle fish and the biggest fish leaving them hanging out to dry, all alone in the government's net. The smallest fish should look for any subtle changes in the behavior of both the middle fish and the biggest fish for clues as to whether those other fish (the middle fish and the biggest fish) will let the smallest fish fry. After all, if the government cannot eat one big fish or several middle fish, it can fill its appetite by eating plenty of small fish. As a result, the smallest fish become paranoid as their fears grow about the threat from each level of fish above them and the government right in front of them.

The Middle Fish

The middle fish have the biggest problem. The government usually flips the smallest fish to get to the middle fish that is closest to the biggest fish. The middle fish have to worry that the smallest fish do not turn them in to the government to fry. The middle fish also have to worry that the biggest fish may distance itself from the middle fish and leave them hanging out to dry. The middle fish should be alert for any subtle changes in behavior from both the smallest fish and the biggest fish. If the government cannot eat the biggest fish, it can always fill its appetite with plenty of small fish and several middle fish. It's particularly tough being the middle fish. As a result, the middle fish often becomes paranoid as they worry about the threat from the smallest fish under it, the biggest fish over it, and the government right in the middle.

The Biggest Fish

The government loves to feast on the biggest fish. After so much hard work and effort, the government's hunger can best be filled by eating the biggest fish. The biggest fish has to keep both the middle fish and the smallest fish in line, while distancing itself from the other fish. It is quite a balancing act. If the biggest fish stays too close to the other fish, it risks being cast too early into the government's net. Rather, the biggest fish hopes that the governments hunger is satisfied by eating only the smallest fish and/or the middle fish.

If the biggest fish distances itself from the either the smallest fish or the middle fish, it risks alienating the other fish who do not want to fry instead of the biggest fish. The biggest fish must remain alert for any subtle changes in the behavior of both the smallest fish and the middle fish. The biggest fish knows that the first one of the other smaller fish (the smallest fish and the middle fish) to cooperate with the government usually gets the best deal and does not become part of the festive meal. It is often called a race to the prosecutor's office to be the first fish in, so the winner may be able to cut the best deal with the government and avoid being fried. As a result, the biggest fish often becomes paranoid, as it fears the threat of the smallest fish and the middle fish below it and the government bearing down on it.

The Government

The government often casts a wide net in its investigation of white collar crime. The government investigators use the smallest fish from its net as bait to catch the middle fish and they use the middle fish as bait to catch the big fish. The government prosecutors feed on the paranoia of the little fish, the middle fish, and the biggest fish as they scramble to avoid becoming part of the government's festive meal.

As I said, the government's wants to fry the big fish to satisfy its strong appetite. However, if the biggest fish does not fry, the other fish will fry, instead of the biggest fish. Both the smallest fish and the middle fish would much rather be eaten raw by the government, than to be cooked deep fried.

After all, how many times have you heard criminals refer to government investigations as "fishing expeditions."

Written by:

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

For additional advice from a convicted felon, please read my other blog posts:

Advice about Trust from a Convicted Felon

The Art of Spinning: How to Identify Possible White Collar Criminals or at Least Unethical and Deceitful People Who You Should Avoid

Other blogs covering this issue:

Tracy Coenen - Sam Antar dishes out some free advice on staying out of prison


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…