Skip to main content

Open Letter to the Audit Committee of Patrick Byrne denies using private eyes

To Clay Corbus and Allison H. Abraham (Audit Committee Members)

There is a certain disclosure by Patrick Byrne, CEO of that requires your immediate attention.

In a previous blog post which I e-mailed to you entitled “Open Letter to the Audit Committee of The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and actions of Patrick Byrne and others," I outlined certain issues of concern to the Audit Committee about possible violations of’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by Patrick Byrne.

In another blog post which I e-mailed you entitled, “Memo to Judd Bagley: Director of Communications at - About Threats on,” I provided you with a copy of a threat to Gary Weiss, which Judd Bagley (Director of Communications at permitted to be published on

Recent disclosure by Patrick Byrne (CEO of in a post on

On May 28, 2007, in a post (message # 7655) on, using the alias Hannibal, Patrick Byrne wrote the following post about private investigators:


However, I read the "Information" filed on Michael Lair, a private investigator that had in fact hired. It states in part:

...additional attorney working for an internet services company involved in a high-profile litigation with hedge funds, which paid $50,000....

I read the "Judgment" filed on Michael Lair, the private investigator that hired. It states in part:

Target Entity:

Loss Amount: $50,000 (04/04/2006)

Contact Info: Jonathon Johnson

6350 South 3000 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84121


Do you believe that the answer that Patrick Byrne (CEO of provided on about using private eyes was deceptive and misleading?'s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

I ask you to consider's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Item 5 of’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics states in part:

No employee should take unfair advantage of anyone through manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged information, misrepresentation of material facts, or any other intentional unfair-dealing practice.

Note: Bold print and italics added by me

Item 14 of’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics states:

In performing his or her duties, each of the Senior Financial Officers must....provide, or cause to be provided, full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with or submits to the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by the Company.

Note: Bold print and italics added by me

Do you believe that Patrick Byrne violated Item 5, above, of’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics?

Do you believe that Patrick Byrne violated Item 14, above, of’s Code of Business Conduct ad Ethics?

Additional Code of Business Conduct and Ethics provisions to consider

The introduction of’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics states in part:

All of our employees must conduct themselves accordingly and seek to avoid even the appearance of improper behavior.

Note: Bold print and italics added by me’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics states in Item 14 that:

…each of the Senior Financial Officers must… maintain high standards of honest and ethical conduct….

Note: Bold print and italics added by me

Request for investigation of Patrick Byrne's post

Therefore, I respectfully request that the matter of Patrick Byrne’s recent disclosure, where he denies the use of private eyes, be investigated by the Audit Committee for possible Code of Business Conduct and Ethics violations and that appropriate action be taken if required.


Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

PS: For additional information about possible violations of's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by Patrick Byrne and Judd Bagley, I suggest that you read these recent posts on other blogs:

O-Smear: The Paris Hilton of Corporate America...

Gary Weiss: The Private Dick that Byrne 'Forgot'


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

Suggested Reading: Hatchet Man Judd Bagley's Downward Spiral: Junkie, Confessed Criminal, Admitted Adulterer by Sam Antar (here), and Closing the File on a Criminal and Junkie Named Judd Bagley by Gary Weiss (here)

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic commen…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…