Skip to main content

Why are people distancing themselves from CEO Patrick Byrne?

My experience

In late 1988, the government investigators were closing in on Eddie and me. Many former friends, colleagues, and co-workers distanced themselves from us. Eventually, I would learn that Eddie’s father (Sam M. Antar), brothers (Allen Antar and Mitchell Antar), and his brother-in-law Ben Kuszer had set us up to take the fall. Later, even my cousin "Crazy" Eddie Antar left me out to hang.

Is a similar situation, going on at delays reporting a Securities and Exchange Commission subpoena to its CEO, Patrick Byrne, for almost a year

On May 9, 2007, disclosed in its 10 - Q that Patrick Byrne (CEO of received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission almost a year earlier on May 17, 2006.’s two Audit Committee Financial Experts – One resigns, the other cashes out most of her holdings

Last night, announced the resignation of Ray J. Groves. Mr. Groves was a member of’s, so-called “independent” Audit Committee. He was one of the two audit committee financial experts on’s Audit Committee.

The other “audit committee financial expert” is Allison H. Abraham. Shortly after disclosed Patrick Byrne’s subpoena, she cashed out most of her position in’s common stock by selling 15,000 shares at $17.2175 each for gross proceeds of $258,262.50.

Patrick Byrne’s relationship with Randy Groves

During an earnings conference call for the third quarter of fiscal year 2005, Patrick Byrne, described his relationship with Ray J. Groves:

Ray Groves is a former managing partner of Ernst & Young -- Ernst & Whinney, then Ernst & Young. I worked with him in the mid '90s on a number of acquisitions, and sat on a couple of boards with him, and in fact, he made me the money that was the origin of Overstock. We did about four deals together, and two of them worked out just spectacularly. And we had a great relationship. We haven't done anything for five or six years together, but literally, the funding from Overstock, when I think of it, when we were still private -- my piece of it all came from deals that I did with Ray. We were in a printing company and a fixed base operator company and a mulch company that we just sold. He has a tremendous business mind as well as, of course, a great financial mind. I think he's going to sit on the audit committee….

Note: Bold and italic print added by me

Ray Groves continues to serve on other company Board of Directors

According to Herb Greenberg’s Market Blog:

Groves remains a director of EDS (eds), where he chairs the audit committee, and Boston Scientific (bsx). Neither company has issued a press release announcing his departure.

Other resignations by Board members

On February 23, 2007, John A. Fisher resigned from the Board of Directors purportedly over a “disagreement with the Company’s pursuit of the lawsuit against the Prime Brokers.”

On July 31, 2006, Patrick Byrne’s father, John J. Byrne, resigned from the Board of Directors. According to’s form 8 – K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

…John J. Byrne announced his retirement from the Board of Directors of the Company due to his new role as Chairman of White Mountains Insurance Group. The resignation did not result from a disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.

However, according to an article in c/net news entitled, “Overstock ‘jihad' divides father and son” published on March 2, 2006, and written by Greg Sandoval:

Even Chairman John "Jack" Byrne, the father of CEO Patrick Byrne, wants his son to give up his fight against bankers, investors and journalists who the younger Byrne claims are trying to purposely deflate his company's stock price.

In an interview with CNET, Patrick Byrne acknowledged that taking up the issue, which has made him one of the nation's most controversial executives, has prompted his father to consider stepping down as chairman.

"I've never expected him to (understand) this fight," said Patrick Byrne of his father. "He's been making noise about stepping down."

Jack Byrne was quoted on the Wall Street Journal's Web site on Thursday as saying that "Patrick and I have had some wonderful times together on Overstock, but we've also had some stormy times. I'd rather keep my relationship with my son than be the chairman of the board...I don't think it's a wise idea to be chairman with a headstrong son."

What is going on at

According to’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Patrick Byrne is required to:

Report to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors any conflict of interest that may arise and any material transaction or relationship that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a conflict...

Did Patrick Byrne promptly report his Securities and Exchange Commission subpoena to’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors?

Did he deliberately hide information about his subpoena from the Audit Committee?

If Patrick Byrne had reported his Securities and Exchange Commission subpoena to the Audit Committee shortly after receiving it, why did the company wait almost a year to disclose it?

Did Patrick Byrne have any disagreements with members of the Audit Committee concerning disclosure of his Securities and Exchange Commission subpoena?

Another provision of’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics states:

Business records and communications often become public, and we should avoid exaggeration, derogatory remarks, guess work, or inappropriate characterizations of people and companies that can be misunderstood. This applies equally to e-mail, internal memos, and formal reports….

In accordance with these policies, in the event of litigation or governmental investigation please consult with the company’s General Counsel.

Patrick Byrne has not avoided “exaggeration, derogatory remarks, guess work, or inappropriate characterizations of people and companies that can be misunderstood.” His well documented actions have been at odds with’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Another question is whether Patrick Byrne promptly consulted with’s General Counsel after receiving his subpoena on May 17, 2006?

If Patrick Byrne had promptly consulted with the Company’s General Counsel about his subpoena, did the General Counsel advise him against disclosing the subpoena to the Audit Committee?


According to the Securities and Exchange Commission:

Companies must comply with the code of ethics disclosure requirements promulgated under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in their annual reports for fiscal years ending on or after July 15, 2003. They also must comply with the requirements regarding disclosure of amendments to, and waivers from, their ethics codes on or after the date on which they file their first annual report in which the code of ethics disclosure is required.

Did make any disclosures "of amendments to, and waivers from" its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics?

If the Company’s Board of Directors permitted actions by Patrick Byrne that were contrary to its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics without disclosing any waiver to the Securities and Exchange Commission, they may be afoul of securities laws.

The Securities and Exchange Commission investigation of and Patrick Byrne continues.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)


In form 8 – K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Ray J. Groves gave his purported reason for resigning:

Please accept my resignation from the board of directors of, Inc. effective immediately. My resignation relates to the Company’s prime broker suit.

Why did Ray J. Groves resign now?

Another Director, John A. Fisher, resigned on February 27, 2007, purportedly for the same reason.

Is it coincidental that Ray J. Groves finally decides to resign after's disclosure of Patrick Byrne’s Securities and Exchange Commission subpoena almost a year after he was subpoenaed?

For additional information about

Please read this web site's blog posts about

O-Smear Blog: Exposing online smear campaigns for what they really are

Gary Weiss Blog: search label

FRAUDfiles Blog


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…