Skip to main content and Patrick Byrne: The Deception Continues

The deception of Patrick Byrne, CEO of, continues on’s web site, despite the company's surprise disclosure in its recent 10-Q, that Mr. Byrne received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2006, about a year ago.

I quote from a page on the web site entitled “Lawsuit (CEO’s Crusade)” about the Securities and Exchange Commission investigation:

Patrick and Business Journalists

Q: Was Overstock behind the SEC subpoenaing business journalists?

A: No.

Q: Has Overstock been subpoenaed?

A: Yes. We received a subpoena from the SEC on May 9, 2006. Prior to receiving the subpoena, we were already cooperating fully with various agencies, including the SEC.

Q: Is Overstock being investigated by the SEC or other agencies?

A: The SEC is conducting an investigation on (see previous question). We are not aware of other investigations by any other agencies.

Note: Bold and italic print was added by me.

I note that the subpoena Patrick Byrne received on May 17, 2006 is not disclosed on’s web site. The web site only refers to the subpoena received on May 9, 2006.

In addition,’s web site clearly plays down the Securities and Exchange Commission investigation of the company. The company infers that the focus of the Securities and Exchange Commission investigation is not by stating that the “The SEC is conducting an investigation on” rather than stating that “The SEC is conducting an investigation of"

Responding to questions by certain business journalists on's web site, Patrick Byrne has purported that:

Here is the punch-line: as a matter of law I must tread carefully here, but I can say that the heart of the investigation is not, I would suggest, Overstock-centric, but rather, concerns itself with a strange set of relationships among ….. Well, let me just say that the irony here is just delicious.

Note: Bold and italic print was added by me.

Later, in a post (message #7271) on, under his alias Hannibal, Patrick Byrne wrote:

"...the shills are now trying to make a case that I should have sent out a second press release when I received another addressed to me as a person, though it was a small fraction as long as the first, covered sub-issues of the first, as well as issues related to a broader investigation that is not about me or Overstock at all."

Note: Bold and italix print added by me

Patrick Byrne is apparently attempting to divert attention from the Securities and Exchange Commission investigation of, by claiming it is "not...Overstock-centric" and the "broader investigation that is not about me [meaning him]or Overstock at all."

Written by,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Late Notes:

According to an SEC Form 4 report, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on May 10, 2007 (right after's recent 10 -Q was filed), Board of Directors member Allison H. Abraham had disposed of 15,000 shares of stock in the company.

Tracy Coenen has new questions for Patrick Byrne based on an alleged insider's anonymous post on

Additional blog posts about's new disclosure of Patrick Byrne's subpoena:

May 9, 2007: Patrick Byrne, CEO of, receives SEC subpoena

May 12, 2007: To Patrick Byrne, CEO of, Stop Deflecting and Start Answering Questions

May 13, 2007: Patrick Byrne, CEO of, Cannot Answer a Simple Question

Other blogs covering the Patrick Byrne subpoena:

The Fraudfiles blog: I have two question for Patrick Byrne, CEO of by Tracy Coenen

Gary Weiss: Bagdad Byrne's Weekend Delusion-a thon

The Fraudfiles blog: A little slight of hand by Patrick Byrne, CEO of, by Tracy Coenen

Lee Distad's Professional Opinion: CEO "forgets" to tell investors that he's been subpoenaed by the SEC...for over a year!

Notions on High and Low Finance: A Conspiracy So Vast, by Floyd Norris (subscription required)

Herb Greenberg's Market Blog: Updated: SEC Subpoenas Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne

O-Smear Blog: The 1281 Word "No Comment"


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…