Skip to main content

Investor Village Et al Limits Sam E. Antar from Asking Questions on - Shame on Them!

Note: As of 12:39 AM several hours later I have been apparently been barred from posting on Investor Village (read bottom of post).

I received the following "private message" from Investor Village relating my activities on that message board where I have been asking questions mostly to Patrick Byrne (CEO of and Judd Bagley (Director of Social Media at and others possibly acting in concert with them about their activities relating to and the smear web site

Link to my prior post on this blog entitled:

From: Admin

Date: 02/20/07 5:20:09 PM

Subject: Admin Notice: your posting privileges have been restricted


This notice is to inform you that based on a review of numerous reports against your account for clogging and other violations of our User Agreement, we have decided in our sole discretion to limit your posting privileges to three messages per 24-hour period, subject to the terms and conditions of use of our service. If you would like to set up your own private or semi-private board at InvestorVillage, you are welcome to do so. We can arrange it so that you can have unlimited posting on your own board, again, subject to our terms and conditions. However, we are putting our foot down on the misuse of our OSTK board for your own agenda, which, for whatever reason, seems to include clogging our forum to conduct an informal and unofficial campaign of "deposition-style" messages targeting other members of InvestorVillage.

If you have any issues with our decision, please take them up with our attorney, Paul Kaplan:

Paul J. Kaplan
Alston & Bird LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30309-3424
TEL: (404) 881-4684
FAX: (404) 253-8679


Ralph "Blue" Kidd
Co-Founder, Chief Community Advocate
Your Voice Inside IV

NOTE: All material contained herein is intended for the recipient only and is strictly private and confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and any copy thereof and report the matter to me as soon as possible at Thank you

My immediate response:

I recently joined the Investor Village Board to post questions of Patrick Byrne (CEO of and Judd Bagley (Director of Social Media at mainly about their activities and their relationship to the smear web site which Mr. Byrne claims has nothing to do with and that Mr. Bagley claims operate in his spare time.

My questions have annoyed other members of the board and especially both Patrick Byrne and Judd Bagley who both are members of the Investor Village board. Patrick Byrne posts on this board under the alias “Hannibal” and Judd Bagley posts under the alias “De Daumier-Smith.”

My questions have been probing and direct. I have been the subject of personal attacks by Patrick Byrne, Judd Bagley, and others on the Investor Village board. Unlike the significant majority of unanimous posters I clearly disclose my full name and the fact that I am the former CFO of Crazy Eddie and a convicted felon on every post. (I used to write ex-felon until a poster on the Wall Street Law Journal blog suggested I change my designation).

On February, 1, 2007, Investor Village tried to silence me after Patrick Byrne and others expressed annoyance at my questions but quickly reinstated me.

Link to Gary Weiss Blog “An Overstock Critic Silenced.”

On February 2, 2007 responding to an anonymous smear attack on me, Patrick Byrne, posting under the alias Hannibal wrote:

“Hey Blackbart,

“I laughed so hard at your message….

Is there anyone here who suspects that Sam is just trying to clog, or waste my time, or misdirect this discussion board? If you agree, please recommend this post. If we get over 20, I say that is proof that it is time we all agree to ignore Sam forever.”

Link to that post here:

Judd Bagley (Director of Social Media at has posted comments on the Investor Village Board on various days and 24 hour periods in excess of the posts I have made but is not subject to any limitation. Patrick Byrne (CEO of is not subject to any limitations on posting. I invite you to read the vile nature of both some of both Byrne and Bagley's posts below (see links provided). Other persons posting malicious attacks have not been subject to the same limitations as me.

Below are links to some questions I have asked Patrick Byrne and Judd Bagley:

On 02/18/07: To Patrick Byrne AKA Hannibal (CEO of Re: Judd Bagley &

On 02/19/07: To Judd Bagley AKA De Daumier Smith (Director of Social Media at Re: Patrick Byrne

For a complete set of my posts on Investor Village link below:

For a complete set of Patrick Byrne’s posts under his alias Hannibal on Investor Village link below:

For a complete set of Judd Bagley’s posts under his alias De Daumier-Smith on Investor Village link below:

More to follow.

To Investor Village:

Your actions are disgraceful and shameful.


Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

PS: Take your best shot.

Link to Gary Weiss Weiss Blog: Sam Antar Gagged Again

Late news:

My new post on Investor Village was deleted after they permitted me to post again since I had 2 available posts. When I tried to re-post my questions they did not appear. (as of 12:39 AM)

I am now apparently banned from posting on Investor Village.


Popular Posts

Did a Clever SEC Bait Goldman Sachs into Compounding Its Legal Problems With the "Kiss of Death" Message?

Updated: At 3:48 AM ET 04/20/2010 on bottom

The Kiss of Death

In filing its lawsuit against Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) on a Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission sent what I call the "kiss of death" message to the embattled company. In other words, the SEC wanted to stick it to Goldman Sachs and Fabrice Tourre, the Executive Director of Goldman Sachs International, who is also a defendant in the complaint. While the SEC as a practice does inform target companies and individuals of an impending enforcement action, it does not always tell them exactly when such an action will be filed.

Apparently, the SEC filed its lawsuit without giving Goldman Sachs the heads up that it was planning to file it that day. Business Insider observed that Goldman Sachs was clearly unprepared to respond to the complaint as news of the lawsuit dominated the headlines all day. Goldman issued a short denial around noon and issued an extensive denial late in the afternoon, after most people had … CEO Patrick Byrne Sleeps With a Gun

In numerous blog posts in the past, and in widespread media coverage, evidence has accumulated for years that CEO (NASDAQ: OSTK) Patrick Byrne has shown signs of being mentally unbalanced and paranoid.

Byrne has blamed his company's financial woes on an unnamed "Sith Lord." He hired paid goons to stalk his real and imagined adversaries and to write lengthy conspiracy theories on the Internet. Byrne has close ties with Bo Gritz. The Anti-Defamation League lists Bo Gritz as a far-right extremist with “extensive connections to both white supremacists and anti-government groups and leaders.”

Patrick Byrne's infamous temper tantrums when he doesn’t get want he wants are well documented too. He made obscene and misogynistic comments to a female reporter. He suggested that she gave “blowjobs” to Goldman Sachs traders. He suggested that a male reporter “Sucks It Likes He’s Paying the Rent.” An independent research analyst was told that “You deserve to be whippe…

Nature's Sunshine Products, Willbros Group, Cal Dive International, and BSQUARE Violate S.E.C. Rules on Calculating EBITDA

Nature’s Sunshine Products (NASDAQ: NATR), Willbros Group (NYSE: WG), Cal Dive International (NYSE: DVR), and BSQUARE (NASDAQ: BSQR) have recently issued earnings reports which include a calculation of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) that apparently does not comply with Securities and Exchange Commission interpretations for Regulation G governing such non-GAAP financial measures. In each case, their erroneous EBITDA calculations have enabled them to significantly distort their financial performance by erroneously reporting a positive EBITDA, when they should have reported a negative EBITDA in the latest quarter.

How EBITDA is supposed to be calculated under Regulation G

According to the S.E.C. Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, EBITDA is defined under Regulation G as net income (not operating income) before net interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. See below:

Question 103.01Question: Exchange Act Release No. 47226 describes E…

InterOil, John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz: Anatomy of a Stock Market Manipulation Scheme

In this blog post, I will provide evidence of what I believe is a stock market manipulation scheme involving InterOil (NYSE: IOC), John Thomas Financial, and Clarion Finanz AG. I believe that InterOil with the assistance of Clarion Finanz concealed John Thomas Financial’s involvement in helping it raise $95 million through a private placement of convertible debt securities.

Clarion Finanz acted as a buffer between InterOil and John Thomas Financial to help InterOil hide John Thomas Financial's role in raising funds. Afterwards, InterOil filed false and misleading reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to conceal John Thomas Financial’s role in helping the company raise $95 million in convertible debt.

Carl Caserta, who in 1991 was barred by the Securities and Exchange Commission from “association with any broker, dealer, or investment advisor” played a role in helping InterOil use John Thomas Financial to obtain funds from investors. InterOil, John Thoma…

Class Action Complaint against Amedisys uses Sarbanes-Oxley Act Corporate Governance Provisions to Battle Alleged Corporate Malfeasance

Updated at bottom of article

Last week, Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP filed a class action lawsuit against Amedisys (NASDAQ: AMED) charging the company, its CEO William F. Borne and its CFO Dale E. Redman with securities fraud.  In the next few days, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Finkelstein Thompson LLP filed similar class action lawsuits against the company. The lawsuits allege that Amedisys abused Medicare's reimbursement system for at-home therapy care based on a compelling analysis of company revenues in an April 27 Wall Street Journal article.

In addition, the lawsuits innovatively utilize a provision under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 which provides a back-door way for investors to force ethical corporate governance and sue public companies for malfeasance. That provision requires Senior Financial Officers, such as the CEO and CFO of public companies, to abide by a strict code of ethics which broadly defines corporate malfeasance and effectively makes…